Our Standards for Clearer Medical Information

We write for U.S. readers who want medical topics in plain English—what the evidence says, where it is thin, and when to bring a clinician into the conversation.

Mission and Editorial Purpose

We write for US readers who want plain-language medical information grounded in public-health and clinical sources—not hype, not fear, and not personalized treatment plans.

Medical research documents and laboratory workspace

What guides our editorial work

Source-first

Claims trace to agencies, guidelines, or peer-reviewed literature.

Plain language

Jargon is explained; limits and uncertainty are stated clearly.

Safety boundaries

No diagnosis, prescribing, or emergency triage on this site.

Correctable

Reader reports are reviewed against sources and updated when warranted.

Clinical Review Protocol

A proposed standard, not a claim of an existing board: define review scope, evaluate sources, note conflicts of interest, and record review dates only when a review actually occurs.

Peer-Review Standards

Peer-reviewed research is weighed with guidelines and public-health information. Peer review does not make a finding conclusive or applicable to every patient.

Sourcing and Fact-Checking

Claims should match their sources, cross-checked, with uncertainty stated.

Corrections

Readers can report errors via Contact. Reports are assessed against sources and corrected where supported. We do not publish a correction history yet.

Medical Safety and Limitations

Articles and tools cannot replace individual clinical assessment. For emergencies in the US, call 911.

Reader Feedback

Send feedback, source suggestions, or correction requests.